by Liz Ready
We all have that one friend. You know
what I’m talking about. They’re the person who only buys their groceries at a
certain grocery store and refuses to eat anything that wasn’t produced
“correctly.” They are extremely aware, almost to a fault, of the impacts their
consumption choices have on the world.
And here’s the thing - We love
that friend. We admire their fierce dedication to the things they’re passionate
about and often cheer them on because, let’s be real, that kind of will power
takes the time and effort we can’t personally seem to muster. But in a
not-so-distant past, our “one friend” probably wouldn’t have been able to
persist such habits.
In our ever globalizing world, never
before have We The People had so much choice or purchasing power. It wasn’t
until 1980 that our beloved super grocer Whole Foods was founded. Our parents,
God bless them, didn’t have access to online grocery delivery services to save
them from a headache-inducing trip to the store with a screaming toddler until 2013. These
times are a changin’, and with more choice comes more opportunity to use our
first-world right to buy whatever we want why ever we please.
Being able to choose
what we do and don’t consume is not always a good thing, even when we
think we’re doing what’s best for our health or what’s right for the
environment. Our society is incredibly privileged in that respect and those
privileges, the choices we get to make, impact our world directly.
As a consumer, you should probably know that one in nine people on this earth1 goes hungry, and that includes the one in six Americans who face hunger on a daily basis.2 Even more alarming is that by 2050 our world will need to find a way to feed 9.7 billion people. There are certain popularized consumption choices that make hunger insecurity issues all the more difficult to solve. Choosing to only buy and consume organic products is one of them.
The economic theory of supply and
demand tells us that when we want organic food, farmers are more likely to
produce such products. However, organic food does not yield as well as
conventionally grown food and ends up being less sustainable than society recognizes. Forbes contributor Steven Savage reported, “To have raised all U.S. crops as organic in 2014 would have
required farming of one hundred nine million more acres of land. That is an
area equivalent to all the parkland and wildland areas in the lower 48 states
or 1.8 times as much as all the urban land in the nation.”3 If everyone chose
to eat organic, we would ruin our environment by using an unnecessary amount of land and natural resources. We would also go hungry
because there wouldn’t be enough land to feed everyone.
If you
or your friend choose to eat organic because it’s healthier for you, think
again. In 2012, The New York Times reported that Stanford University scientists found “fruits and vegetables
labeled organic were, on average, no more nutritious than their conventional
counterparts, which tend to be far less expensive. Nor were they any less
likely to be contaminated by dangerous bacteria like E. coli.”4 And if you’re worried about
the pesticides used on conventionally grown crops, the same rule applies - it’s
safe to eat thanks to our government’s strict USDA and EPA regulations. (Click the link to read more about pesticide regulations in a separate blog post I wrote.)
Our
first-world, privileged consumer choice to only eat organic has serious ethical
implications we can no longer ignore. It’s time for us, the consumer, to get a
grip at the grocery store. If growing organic food uses more land, more
resources and isn’t any healthier than conventionally grown crops, why do we
allow ourselves to believe the opposite? The next time you have a choice to
purchase organic food, let proven data be the decision maker, not societal
norms.
Sources:
1 World Hunger Stastics (n.d.). Retrieved October
28, 2018, from http://www.foodaidfoundation.org/word-hunger-stastics.html
2 11 Facts About Hunger in the US. (n.d.).
Retrieved October 29, 2018, from https://www.dosomething.org/facts/11-facts-about-hunger-us
3 Savage, S. (2015, October 09). The Lower
Productivity Of Organic Farming: A New Analysis And Its Big Implications.
Retrieved October 29, 2018, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensavage/2015/10/09/the-organic-farming-yield-gap/#5db3d76b5e0e
4 Chang, K. (2012, September 03). Study Questions
Advantages of Organic Meat and Produce. Retrieved October 29, 2018, from
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/science/earth/study-questions-advantages-of-organic-meat-and-produce.html?_r=1
Liz,
ReplyDeleteI wanted to start off by saying that I love the research your conducting. I liked that your topic you are talking about is very big passion that you have in this field, it shows in your writing. It's also crazy that 1 in 9 people go starving in this world, I am also curious that what falls into that category, because starving is a very broad term so that could mean anything. For example, there is the lack of a clean water source for lots of countries in Africa. In a research study done by Water For Africa, they talked about a certain event that they did to raise awareness for Africa showing how far woman had to travel to get clean water. In the study they showed the distance that woman had to walk just to get a clean source of water in the Paris Marathon, and it captivated a huge audience to start caring about people who need help in different countries. If water does fall into that category than thats a crazy number to think about. There was also a study done on how "organic" food doesn't necessarily mean its organic at all, but there is ways of telling if it is really organic and good for your body. Some feedback I would give you would be to explore more avenues of different researches already done.
sincerely,
Ray